![]() ![]() Notability is based on objective evidence of whether sufficient reliable sources have taken notice already, not on subjective judgments of whether people should take notice in the future. It is difficult to determine precisely what people believe in the present, even more difficult to predict how perceptions will change in the future, and completely unnecessary to even try. DasReboot ( talk) 21:01, 23 January 2008 (UTC) Reply "Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, and editors should avoid using one when commenting in a deletion discussion. Lets wait and see how KGB Archiver develops. Imagine if many years ago Wikipedia have deleted article about Winamp or DC++ because of lack of notability. I don't know is KGB Archiver PAQ spinoff or not, but I find it very useful tool and I think Wikipedia should have article about it. THE BEST COMPRESSION TOOL EVER! - Walt e r Humala - Emperor of West Wikipedia | wanna Talk? 02:49, 17 December 2006 (UTC) Reply The original PAQ executables used doesn't support additional features, like encryption (that is instead integrated in KGB Archiver), solid archiving or volume spanning, which however you can perform in a second pass using another PeaZip supported format with those features, like split, PEA or 7Z. PeaZip is a graphical frontend for Matt Mahoney's PAQ8F and Bill Pettis's PAQ8JD you can create, browse and extract archives in those two PAQ8 formats. Is there a graphical front end for PAQ8 yet? Renegadeviking 2:52PM 10/11/06 You document the violation from a reputable source and put it in the article. Third, you don't delete an article to punish someone for alleged GPL violations. Second, the article on PAQ has no citation establishing that KGB Archiver violates the GPL. First, Neither you using KGB Archiver or KJB claiming to be under GPL says anything about whether KGB Archiver violates the GPL. ![]() #Kgb archiver gui licenseRenegadeviking 2:52PM 10/11/06 I used 1.2.1.24 and it is under GPL, so as for I can see there should be no license issues. Should we remove KGB Archiver from Wiki as it clearly violated the GPL?. Unfortunately the author of KGB doesn't respect the GPL license of PAQ6 (see ). In fact KGB is PAQ6v2 with a GUI created on top of it. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter. This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. This article is supported by WikiProject Software. This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Computing Wikipedia:WikiProject Computing Template:WikiProject Computing Computing articles If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. The result of the discussion was Nomination withdrawn. This article was nominated for deletion on 24 April 2010 (UTC). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |